Analysis of Terracotta Army Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Analysis of Terracotta Army - look Paper ExampleThe artifacts are contained in three pits and so far, documented evidence indicates that up to 7000 warriors and weapons arrive at been excavated by the archeologists. The artifacts contain foot soldiers and war chariots that are made from wood. Foot soldiers are basically graphical figures that resemble human soldiers. In his study, Dillon indicates that the size of each warrior is approximately 1.8 meters (Dillon 43). Further, they are characterized by broad foreheads and thick-lipped mouths. A significant percentage of these have ornate hairstyles. Nonetheless, they generally show a distinct dedication and ending in their duties. This is because their eyes are directly focused ahead into some distance. The soldiers are also presented to be in a combat position. Their positions are realistic and their eyes very bright. They have wide nostrils and tidy yet very strong legs. These attributes imply that the horses were well maintain ed and relatively serviceable. It cannot be disputed that this peculiar(a) population invested a significant percentage of resources in war. This also implies that the communities surrounding the region were hostile and as invested in different wars in social security. The position of their hips and legs imply that they are ready to gallop. Notably, the artifacts show that in that respect were two different types of soldiers the artillery and infantry. The artillery soldiers are presented dressed in knee-length tunics and short trousers. In addition, they carry crossbows with them, ready to engage in a fight at any time. Seemingly, their uniforms were made from lax materials, enabling them to move around with ease. Under battle conditions, these soldiers would probably be dispatched to engage in fighting at any time. The infantry faction, on the other hand, was heavily armored. In particular, they were presented while carrying swords. With respect to the flair of dress, Dillon cites that they wore shin guards and caps in addition to their normal uniform (Dillon 77). Comparatively, they were also taller than their counterparts.