Philosophers Views on Abortion Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Philosophers Views on Abortion - Case Study grammatical caseHowever, some people especially those who support abortion have for centuries argued that the life of a mother is schoolmaster to that of the unborn therefore, any life that put the life of the mother at any risk should be eliminated and the mother let to live. Regardless of the counter-argument on abortion, it is not right, at any point in time, to necessitate abortion since it constitutes to terminate life however, under well-argued and confirm ground it may be an option to extradite the mothers life. Regardless of the position, one may take the arguments on abortion have proven to be highly defensive and dogmatic. Furthermore, they concentrate on one perspective without looking at the whole issue in line with its psychological, object lesson, biological, and sociological complexity. Abortion is a difficult issue however, it can be resolved if some(prenominal) sides of the debate look at the abortion arguments in op en minds. Additionally, all the contributors and involved stakeholders must suffer to work together towards the same goal without advance prejudice of the issue. Therefore, it is not advantageous if the entire clement race to follow demagogic slogans that politically work thinking on vital issues such as abortion thus, the human race must all time debate on these vital issues with rational, moral stands. Philosophers Views on Abortion The fundamental problem of abortion is the moral justification of the status of the fetus. The philosophical intelligence has three basic positions upon which they advance their arguments including conservative, liberal, and moderate. The liberal position is the contribution of Judith Jarvis Thomson. In her contribution, Judith assumed that conservatives did not influence the ideals of their supporters. Contributing to the issue, Judith argues that the moral status of any fetus is at all times justifiable in varied cases (DeGrazia, Mappes, and Bran d-Ballard 482). She created a berth where someone is kidnapped because of preserving the life of unconscious violinist. Additionally, she argues that the living human beings are cogitate through sharing the same kidney. Therefore, if there is the detachment between the kidneys of these two lives, before the end of the quantity nine months of pregnancy, then the violinist automatically dies. According to Thomson, it is not an obvious obligation for humanity to divide the kidney with the unborn (DeGrazia, Mappes, and Brand-Ballard 582). Additionally, she argues that sharing of the kidney creates an analog situation where the fetus uses the mothers body. Therefore, according to Thomson, abortion should be accepted and justified at all costs since the fetus only depends on the mother. She adds that abortion is justified in cases of bobble, when a womans life is in danger, and when a woman has reasonable precaution to evade pregnancy. This reason may be considered patently false an d exaggerated. In her argument, Thomson seems to disregard the distinctive character of the case that is the exploitation fetus. Even in rape cases, the killing of the fetus is not justifiable thus, it remains morally unacceptable. Nonetheless, rape is also morally condemnable. Relating Roses case in the A Brain Dead contract Gives Birth case study, Thomson will advocate for the death of the fetus in a quite fragile circumstance (DeGrazia, Mappes, and Brand-Ballard720). According to Thomson, the fetus is just, but a burden to the mother and in a situation where the mothers life is at risk, the fetus must just be aborted.